The Curation and Engagement Leagues - Sponsored by @carlgnash and @paulag!

Hello all!

Welcome to this weeks Curation and Engagement leagues, kindly sponsored by @carlgnash and @paulag.

Thank you both very much for the extra STEEM boost, which allows me to reward the best curators and engagers of the past 7 days.

To enter the leagues drop a comment below (Lifetime membership - unless you ask to be removed)

On your marks, get set, curate!


newtitle.png


Introduction

My general views on curation rewards (to score highly in League 1) are:

  • Vote before the big hitters, but not too early!

  • Voting in the first minute will earn you a curation reward of almost 0.000

  • Voting between 1 and 29 minutes will earn an increasing % of the curation rewards split, this value peaking at 30 minutes and remaining the same from this point onwards

  • It is commonly suggested that 15-25 minutes is the 'best' time to vote (especially on known 'power author' posts because they are likely to have more auto-votes coming in at these times - and you want to be ahead of these votes)

  • Voting on good dtube content and utopian-io approved contributions (prior to the vote by @dtube / @utopian-io ) can earn some very good curation rewards

  • Voting on @ocd posts is likely to gain good curation rewards as founder @acidyo, and @anomadsoul support these posts after giving time for other accounts to vote - you will be in front of a couple of large votes here!

As you can see, a combination of many variables such as Steem Power, voting strength, voting weight, time of vote, (and more) all play a part in the amount of rewards received.

My general opinion on maximizing engagement (to score highly in League 2) is:

  • Spread your vote and write lots of engaging comments!

  • Use your vote on comments (and not yourself) to make yourself seen and provoke a reply


The data for league 1

The raw data has been collected from SteemSQL - @arcange's MS SQL Server copy of the Steem Blockchain.

The formula used for 'quality of financial curation skill' is:

Curation Rewards DIVIDED BY Steem Power MULTIPLIED BY 1000

This will return the amount of Curation rewards gained per 1000 Steem Power held


The rules (which will cause auto-filtering of your account if not met so just enter anyway and see what happens!) to appear in this league:

  • No programmed voting! Following a trail is OK, using a script to vote for you is not (but well done if you have done that!)

  • Must have voted at least once on a piece of content in the past 7 days

  • Must not have leased or delegated Steem Power in the last 14 days

  • Must not have Started a Power Down (withdrawal of Steem Power) in the last 15 days

The 2nd and 3rd points above are not bad things, but are required to reduce distortion of the figures.

And, as curation rewards for the past week are actually taken from votes made up to 14 days ago, we need a 15 day window as mentioned above.

Don't let this put you off entering though - you will be automatically be excluded/appear depending on the criteria above.

League 1 - Curating to maximize returns

See the rules above if you are missing from this table

The end column is what I think is a genuine indicator of how well you are financially working the curation game with the tools, including vested Steem Power, that you have at your disposal.


This Week's winners!

Congratulations to the curating Mannequin known as @steemitri! A previous winner, and a finely moulded piece of plastic, he has worked his way back to the top - molto bene!

And well done to @pataty69, @markangeltrueman, @osm0sis, @r-bot (not a bot!), @steemtrail, @sjennon, @fullcoverbetting, @cron, and @greenrun for earning their place in the top 10.

All of the above will be getting some STEEM :)


League 2 - Engagement and Excellence - Write on!


ossyjay.png

This the newer league which is not based around rewards and relates to engagement.

Everyone currently on my master list has a chance here - delegation dealings or not.

I've used some metrics (which is the fancy way of saying that made up some numbers) relating to:

  • Posts (P)
  • Comments - number of (C)
  • Comments - replies to replies - depth > 2 (C R) (new this week)
  • Comments - length in characters (C L)
  • Witness votes (W) (for those proxying witness votes, your total is always 30)
  • Upvotes to others (V)
  • Upvotes to different authors (U V)
  • Self-votes - a small minus score for this one sorry! (S V)


Firstly, if you are placed in the table above then you are doing great and are among the top 20%!

Congratulations to @glenalbrethsen who tops the league of engagement and excellence this week. I have seen this name all over the Blockchain this week and top place is much deserved, well done!

Very well done also to @lynncoyle1 and @leeart who finished 2nd and 3rd this week - both were also in the top 3 last week :)

Excellent engagement levels also from @gillianpearce, @maverickinvictus, @themanwithnoname, @fullcoverbetting, @mirrors, @abh12345, @simplymike, and @davemccoy.

Do you want to be a part of the leagues? Let me know below!


Prizes sent!

League 1

League 2

A little free publicity for @maarnio there too :D

A prize is also being issued to lucky number 25th place in league 2, courtesy of @fullcoverbetting who came up with the idea during the past week - Well done @barge!

Delegation Prizes

The most consistent performers, and especially those in need of a boost on the way to the holy grail of 500 SP, could also receive a small delegation. This week:

50 SP added (100 SP total) - @leeart
50 SP - @mirrors
50 SP added (150 SP total) - @fullcoverbetting


Finally

  • If you have spotted any glaring errors in my post, please let me know so I can fix them

  • If you would like to be added or removed from my personal curation league, let me know

  • If you have any other comments or suggestions, please enter them into the box below


As always, thank you very much for your support!

Asher @abh12345


If you feel that the Curation Leagues a worthwhile addition to the Steem Blockchain, please consider a vote for our (myself and @paulag) witness - @steemcommunity - https://steemit.com/~witnesses

And, if you think this could also be considered a project and agree with what I have put forward to @roelandp here, perhaps a word of support may be of use - but please be as tactful as possible, thank you!

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
466 Comments