Sharing Some Insightful Thoughts on Steem from a Senior Scholar

Yesterday, I came across a lecture slide made by a senior professor who has authoriteies in water management policy. Here is the original contents

Conclusions – can water policy become sustainable?
 Acknowledge importance of broad-scale participation in decisions; include various publics and NGOs.
 Admit that no group has a monopoly of knowledge about water; groups define needs differently – e.g., irrigation, power, flooding: incorporating local knowledge in important.
 Emphasize adaptive solutions that are small-scale, incremental and reversible if they fail.
 Understand that control over water must be tempered by fairness and accountability: if groups feel excluded from decisions, they will resist; if encouraged to participate, they will likely innovate!

Here's my applications for Steem.

1. Broad-scale participation in decisions: We need that participation in both quality (by logic and knowledge) and quantity (by stake).
2. Admit that no group has a monopoly of knowledge/incorporating local knowledge in important: User's feedback is as important as Steemit's research. However, none of them is deterministic. What we need is incorporation among them.
3. Adaptive solutions that are small-scale, incremental and reversible if they fail: Step-by-step hardfork is desired.
4. If groups feel excluded from decisions, they will resist; if encouraged to participate, they will likely innovate!