Tell the USDA: No GE Fuji Apples!

 After  decades of promises from the biotech industry that genetically  engineered (GE) food would feed the world, cure the sick, reduce  agricultural dependence on toxic chemicals, and save countless crops  from imminent collapse, industry is poised to finally release a product  they think will solve a problem humans have struggled with for  centuries… an apple that doesn’t brown when you slice it… Seriously; we  couldn’t make this stuff up.
 

Last year, despite comments from nearly 80,000 CFS members alone, USDA  approved the first varieties of GE apples - Granny Smith and Golden  Delicious varieties of Intrexon/Okanagan Specialty Fruit’s “Arctic  Apple”. Now, the agency is proposing to approve a new GE Arctic Apple  variety—a Fuji—using the same incomplete environmental and food safety  studies used to approve the first varieties. Meaning there are no new  studies addressing the concerns raised in the last comment period, and  since the first GE apples haven’t hit the commercial market, there are  no market data, either. This is simply a rubber stamp approval.
 

While these GE apples are a waste of time and money, we don’t want to  downplay the real concerns about them. Pre-sliced apples are actually a  frequently recalled food product. Once the whole fruit is sliced, it has  an increased risk of exposure to pathogens. Since browning is a sign  that apples are no longer fresh, “masking” this natural signal could  lead people to consume contaminated apples.
 

Further, since FDA does no independent, pre-market safety testing of GE  food there are several unanswered questions about the safety of GE  apples. “Silencing” the genes that make apples turn brown when exposed  to oxygen could have unintended consequences that will only be tested by  hungry consumers. Although these apples are primarily targeted to the  fresh-sliced apple market they could also find their way into non-GE  juice, baby foods or apple sauce at the processing level, all products  predominantly eaten by children and babies who are at increased risk for  any adverse health effects.
 

Even the apple industry has opposed this genetically engineered  product.  The U.S. Apple Association, Northwest Horticultural Council  (which represents Washington apple growers, who grow over 60% of the  apples in the U.S.), British Columbia Fruit Growers Association and  other grower groups have already voiced their disapproval of these GE  apples due to the negative impact they could have on farmers growing  organic and non-GE apples through contamination, and to the image of the  apple industry as a whole.
 

If the apple industry doesn’t want GE apples, and consumers don’t want  GE apples, who do these apples really benefit? As usual, this product  only benefits the biotech industry and big food processing companies.
 

Tell USDA to Reject this GE Apple! 

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
1 Comment