We should be responsible for our lives, and we should encourage the private intiative, and the right ways of doing things. And democracies are about getting the will in the people, and that people tell the government what to do, and that we should do sensible things and positive things, and not dwelling with stupid things and negative things.
This cases of descriptive and normative democratic theory focuses attention on seven related issues. It proposes a definition of democracy as a collective decision-making where people can give their opinions about what is going on. Second, it outlines different approaches to the question of why democracy is morally valuable at all. And that is that we are getting right and wrong issues and problems coming to the stages with same and different agenda about things, people and building, and all things we can see and think about. The democracy is about the issue of whether and when democratic institutions have authority and different conceptions of the limits of democratic authority. And last but not least, the democracy solution explores the question of what it is reasonable to demand of citizens in large democratic societies. And therefore, there are many opinions about democracy, and people have to all times have different opinions about it, and some of these are right and some are wrong, and that is the philosophy of living and operating and working in democracies.
The word 'democracy' has its origins in the Greek language. It combines two shorter words: 'demos' meaning whole citizen living within a particular city-state and 'kratos' meaning power or rule. ... A belief in shared power: based on a suspicion of concentrated power (whether by individuals, groups or governments). So, democracy is about the citizens in any nation to determine the power and what should be the point of thinking, and what should be the right things to do. And people are determining the philosophy of the nations with their standpoints and opinions.
We should not develop any trust or any positive relation to any organization unless it is ranked as best that is possible, and hence organizations are bad or good to work within. And we should not care of any voices and noises, but we should be ourselves, and forming the life just as we like it, and loyalty is something that does not sense, or it is sensible. But if there are too much chatting about wrong things in the organizations, we are getting wrong decisions, and therefore there should be chatting about constructive things, and we should support organizations going in the rigth ways, and otherwise we do not care and we are not doing anything, because everyone going in the schools has learned to do counting in many ways, also in the childhood. And research is examinations from all ages in the life, and we can dwell with everything that is possible at every stage in life. You know probably the book: «Exit, voice and loyalty», and we should use this book in life, but making and taking the responsibility, that is our own decision. And the books in the schools, we are knowing, and we should love the people we are meeting, and being constructive. But we cannot agree in all works, since something is stupid behavior to do. And putting people in prison without any good reasons, there should be many reactions to, and the whole board, the leaders and the minister should withdraw, and we cannot accept the opinions in such organizations.
What is the main idea with any democracy? Democracy is government in which power and civic responsibility are exercised by all adult citizens, directly, or through their freely elected representatives. Democracy rests upon the principles of majority rule and individual rights.
Please do follow if you want to keep up with my next article. Any upvotes or resteems are hugely appreciated!
Latest article, check out :
The history of music artists; The case of Aerosmith!
Sverre Larsen
Kristiansand, Norway
Latest content: Travel, Art, Food, Article, Poetry
