Why Open-Source Protocols will bring in Journalistic Competition that is Direly Needed

hansikhosue_journalism.jpg

Dear Diary,


It kills me to do this again and again but it’s kind of like a comedian who cannot leave a ridiculous/embarrassing situation alone. I wrote this post a few months back, lamenting how much mainstream news has devolved into a strange mutant chimera of a gossip column, knee-jerk blabbering, and the ever so rare individual report that stands on its own two legs and doesn’t rely on Trump’s latest tweet. Whether you’re left or right-leaning, you have to admit that the domain of journalism is undergoing a crisis that threatens its legitimacy and standing in the world.

I try really hard, I really do, to give credit to solid journalism regardless of what channel it is broadcast from. We’re seeing more and more outlets basically choosing sides. This can’t really be helped as news companies become more corporate with political executives with great sway. People tend to shuttle into the Fox camp or the MSNBC group. They’re openly more critical of the other side and in a strange way, that makes it somewhat ok. What seems most ridiculous in this political climate is the last contender, CNN.

And despite how much I try, I can’t help but cringe everyday at the pitfalls of the network. Some days they go whole-hog on social-media. Sometimes they’re give never-ending coverage to an insignificant issue (anything with “Bieber” or “Kardashian” in the title). Others, they’ll published reports like the following that are no more digital mumble.

The one thing journalists absolutely need is a sense of accountability. When they report something that is mistaken or breach ethics of confidence, they should be pressured in rectifying the issue. Another sense of accountability can come from shame. And today I’d like to shame Chris Cillizza who came out with this embarrassment of an “article” which really amounts to no more than a pre-teen’s diary entry and I earnestly feel like I’ve wasted my time after reading it. The following are actually snippets of the piece -

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.12.22 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.12.37 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.12.48 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.12.58 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.13.07 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.13.19 PM.png

What's even more shocking, take a look at his damn Twitter account.

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.14.16 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.14.31 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.14.44 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-04-18 at 5.14.54 PM.png

  • I took these screenshots at 5pm EST on April 18. I didn’t even manage to break a 3-hour window.

Personally, I’m very interested in the Comey-Trump tit for tat that has been going on since early 2017. The latest Comey interview was supposed to be a very revealing expose on the former Director’s dealings with the sitting president. Before jumping into the full video, I wanted a Sparknotes version of what occurred so I thought I would skim this article.

I’m a firm believer that a profession should uphold a standard that every actor should aspire to reach. The more professionals that fail to meet that bar, the less respectable the profession itself is.

I read over this “article,” then in disbelief, scoped out Cillizza’s Twitter to allay my fears that this man is little more than a gossip columnist for CNN. I was shocked by the sheer number of tiny little messages blasted into the world. I’ve seen Twitter-centric reporters before but Cillizza’s wall reminded me a pre-pubertine child with little more than a handful of classmates that are ‘friends’ with him on the platform.

It never ends…

I know I shouldn’t judge the crop from a view bad apples, but this is truly ridiculous. We’ve seen the nasty effects of social-media degrade at the professional foundations of journalism and it’s a sad state of affairs when you can’t distinguish between the Opinion section with the front page.

Transparent and Open-Source is a better Marketplace for Integrity


I suppose I should talk a bit about blockchain at this point. We’ve gotten to the point, after about 10-15 years of pure/inconsequential internet enjoyment, that everything is being mushed together in the digital stratosphere. News, social-media, complete falsehoods, speculations, and everything in between are overlapping at a rapid pace and there are very few tools that give us the ability to sift through the noise. Even on ‘reputable’ and dedicated platforms like CNN.com, it is very very difficult to parse apart what is objective news and what is dripping in bias and vindictiveness.

More and more options are becoming available in the blockchain space. Projects like CIVIL promise to make journalism less reliant on the massive corporations that mediate our news. A decentralized and transparent news system will make it easier for us to verify what is true and keep journalists 100% accountable.

I do believe that is an industry that direly needs a facelift and blockchain might just be able to provide that. Let me know your thoughts and experiences in the comments below!

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
7 Comments