In case you've missed it:
15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.
The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.
One of the most important testimonies on the collapse of the World Trade Towers that was brought to attention in the study comes from the head structural engineer of the towers, John Skilling. It is apparently not enough for skeptics to take the findings of thousands of architects and engineers seriously, but should a skeptic choose not to at least consider the expertise of one of the men who built the WTC towers, then they are purposefully remaining blind.
Every sort of catastrophe that can happen to a high-rise building has to be taken into consideration during the design and construction processes, including the impact of an airplane. According to a 1993 report from The Seattle Times, the Trade Towers were analyzed years ago, after concern was raised over a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building. It was concluded at the time that the Trade Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.
In a statement made to The Seattle Times by Skilling:
“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”
As stated in the study: “In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.” It should be pointed out, as well, that a steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire. And yet on September 11, 2001, three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.
It was on this latter point that the authors concluded their study. They state:
“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.”
Read more:
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: http://anonymous-news.com/architects-engineers-911-truth/
University of Alaska Launches 9/11 Controlled Demolition Investigation: http://anonymous-news.com/university-alaska-launches-911-controlled-demolition-investigation/
Small 9/11 Truth Victory Unknown to Most Americans: UK Man Won Case against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up: http://anonymous-news.com/small-911-truth-victory-unknown-to-most-americans-uk-man-won-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up/
Do you like our independent news and content and want to support unbiased, global news? Then please follow us! Thank you.
This article is shared from our official site http://anonymous-news.com/european-scientific-journal-concludes-911-was-a-controlled-demolition/
You can also donate to us, every donation, no matter how small, is kindly appreciated. Thank you very much.
Here are our wallet addresses you can donate to :
Bitcoin: 17keMxjCg47YwZtrXbcvgPfrotPwWB9GBT
Dogecoin: DUCxWVRpvRCVEJ5cMznfhTyY7h4bMDU9ET
Ethereum: 0x248f1f8bd04831f42b939050383312272ee7b586
Litecoin: LXRpRGyiTAHGfqkzfSENuwddNBTMCErgpB
DASH: XxQJWjNdPd2QTjZRnFJivUSDbgp4dTNXfg
Namecoin: NHRczqv5FRz2kexeFhqrGew552gTUmL4DD
Peercoin: PLjQ9v3yKENTbSbKU1CiG8fdpHpy9aaw7N
Vertcoin: VjU8Tec32GPSUW3BuWa7xyK4fyj3s2Fokv
The DAO: 0xa2d8e97653f1d25ec46cf9781f29716e4da01400
Monero:456EEsoT2gmVaG6j1syt6ZRcC4Ef8PfioMf5ywoKbSrLSiGcJHMc6PVNFhvx3iZPSoK9VxgGhuMXYg2kkHhLkgfu83GKsTg
Thank you.