In going back to the owner of 8chan, Fredrick Brennan used to be the owner and has quite the story.
It appears he was allowing a Hebe board to run and when you see some of the posts, they are self proclaimed pedophiles who like to categorize age groups of children and speak of "what is legal." While also giving grooming tips.
It is a known fact Brennan allowed the board to run and this group was protected, but when Jim Watkins purchased 8chan from Brennan who was having trouble managing the site. . .Brennan took the pedo board down. When Watkins questions Brennan about the board, he was very nonchalant about it. It appears obvious Brennan had no issue with it or he would have taken it down himself.
The pedos had a fit. Then throughout the last three years a seed of hate appeared to be festering among Brennan towards Watkins. Almost as if he was blaming Watkins for his (Brennan's) lack of success. There is a great deal going on with this story as some of what Brennan has said in tweets and posts on 8chan appear to reveal him feeling inadequate due to how his father treated him. It appears Brennan has trouble accepting responsibility for his own actions and resorts to the blame game.
What ensued was Brennan going on a rage, contacting any company who agreed to host 8chan and telling them that 8chan allowed hate speech because some of the shooters had posted manifestos there. Though this doesn't hold water as pointed out earlier, shooters have Also posted info on FB, instagram and twitter yet No One is holding those platforms accountable for someone else's actions.
There may be a link as to Why this occurred or who may have been behind in by looking at a group funded by Soros. See in sources below on the Atlantic Council and George Soros.
This tweet is a clue to how vindictive Brennan is and the lengths he will go to in order to feed his own hate.
Here he can be seen bragging once again about what he does.
Travis View has been a speaker for the Atlantic Council with ties to George Soros.
According to Zero Hedge,
“The Atlantic Council has accepted donations from funds owned by George Soros and a multitude of other foreign and domestic special interest groups, pushed harmful and imperialistic neoconservative political viewpoints to intellectuals and readers and promoted “black propaganda” now debunked by the intelligence community claiming that Russia was likely to hack the 2016 U.S. Presidential elections, and that Wikileaks is a pawn of the Russian government.”
In an article from Gateway Pundit titled,
Update… Schiff Staffer Traveled To Ukraine In Trip Paid For By Group Funded By Hunter Biden’s Old Firm: REPORT
The trip by a staffer on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, on which Schiff serves as chairman, was “sponsored and organized by the Atlantic Council think tank,” Breitbart reports. “The council is funded by and routinely works in partnership with Burisma, the natural gas company at the center of allegations regarding Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.”
From Clerkhouse dot gov,
Look who is on the Atlantic Council, who Paid for this trip. . .
John Brennan Also involved with Crowdstrike
Back to Crowdstrike importance at the bottom.
While at Indiana University, Gates was recruited by the Central Intelligence Agency and joined in 1966
For the Atlantic Council it claims Insights and Impact by both China and the European Union.
Who promotes the European Union? George Soros!
Whoa. ..their "gifts of Minimal value" for accepting gifts from foreign diplomats currently $392! Wow! I don't think I spend That much on a family of 4 on a good year for Christmas. Pretty sure All Good years have disappeared as they worked hard to destroy what used to be the middle class.
Notice how members from the Atlantic Council are also networked with the press.
Hmmm Disinformation in countries. . .Don't they mean all information that goes Against their agenda or exposes what certain known corruptors have been up to?
According to Independent Sentinel,
Adam Schiff’s staffer Thomas Eager flew to Ukraine on a mission to gain information which may very well have been to dig up impeachment dirt. The trip was paid for by Burisma, Hunter Biden’s recently former company. During the trip, Eager met with a witness in the impeachment inquiry Ambassador Bill Taylor. It was Eager’s first meeting upon arrival.
That’s not suspicious at all. Move on.
Besides funding from Burisma, the Atlantic Council is also financed by Google Capital, billionaire activist George Soros’s Open Society Foundations as well as the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. and the U.S. State Department.
John McCain’s buddy, the man behind the dossier who runs the McCain Institute, David Kramer, also went.
What we now know is that it is the Democrats Have strong ties to the corrupt government of Ukraine and, especially the Russian puppet President at the time Poroshenko.
The Democrats landed in Ukraine with the plagiarizer, liar, Joe Biden as the point man. It wasn’t only his son and John Kerry’s stepson and family friend who made out like Ukrainian oligarchs, it was other Democrats as well.
Adam Schiff takes a good deal of money from a Ukrainian arms dealer, and allegedly funneled $60 million back at him. Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul Jr. has cashed in. George Soros is involved in Burisma deals. Burisma is the company that made Hunter Biden rich.
The setup might have started in 2015 when Nancy Pelosi went to Italy and Ukraine with a delegation.
Italy and Ukraine are two countries potentially involved in the spying on the Trump campaign.
Mitt Romney, a Democrat-at-heart, allegedly had an advisor on the Burisma board.
During the trip, the staffer’s first meeting was with acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor, now a key witness for Democrats pursuing impeachment. He is the one who wrote a September 9th email expressing concern that the holdup on military funds to Ukraine was a quid pro quo.
The timing of that email is also interesting since it was post-trip.
The Atlantic Council receives funding from and works in conjunction with Burisma.
Taylor is to appear next week to testify before the Democrats’ Soviet-style tribunal which is attempting to impeach the President in secret.
William Taylor himself has evidenced a close relationship with the Burisma-funded Atlantic Council.
Eager is a fellow at the “Atlantic Council” which is owned (funded) by “Burisma,” and he took a ‘bipartisan’ trip to Ukraine, and while he was on this perfectly “bipartisan” trip he just happened to meet with a key witness in the impeachment inquiry and it was the first thing he did. It was all paid for by Burisma.
The itinerary for the August 24 to August 31 trip shows that the delegation’s first meeting upon arrival in Ukraine was with Taylor.
Adam Schiff’s timeline exposes a possible scam. Actually, it smells!
Back to Crowdsrike and Why it is so important.
As reported by Conservative Treehouse,
To understand how important this is, we must remember the foundation for the entire Russian election interference narrative, ‘Muh Russia – writ large, is built on the claim Russians hacked the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently released damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders.
Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ and FBI previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server or cloud-based network. Instead the original claim was that the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike.
According to the original FBI statements made by James Comey: Crowdstrike did the captured imaging of the DNC network (servers/cloud), then conducted analysis, then provided a report to the DNC with their findings; and that report was given to the FBI. At least that was the original 2017 claim. However, during court filings in the case against Roger Stone, the DOJ/FBI later admitted they never even saw the Crowstrike final report.
Lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server or cloud data, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the final Crowdstrike report.
The narrative around the DNC hack claim was always sketchy; many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked. Crowdstrike was a private contractor holding a strong conflict of interest over Clinton and DNC interests. With this FBI court admission the scale of sketchy increased exponentially.
There was, and still is, absolutely no evidence the DNC was “hacked” (WikiLeaks claims the information was an inside job of “leaking”), and even John Podesta admitted himself he was a victim of an ordinary “phishing” password change scam.
This admission meant the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party….. despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.
The entire apparatus of the U.S. government just took their word for it…
…and used the claim therein as an official position….
…which led to a subsequent government claim, in court, of absolute certainty that Russia hacked the DNC.
Think about that for a few minutes.
The full intelligence apparatus of the United States government is relying on a report they have never even been allowed to see or confirm; that was created by a paid contractor for a political victim that would not allow the FBI to investigate their claim.
The DNC server issue is foundation, and cornerstone, of the U.S. government’s position on “Russia hacking” and the election interference narrative; and that narrative is based on zero factual evidence to affirm the U.S. government’s position.
…”the government does not need to prove at the defendant’s trial that the Russians hacked the DNC”… (pg 3)
the December 29th, 2016, Joint Analysis Report on Russia Cyber Activity was a quickly compiled bunch of nonsense about Russian hacking.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf here) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor.
This report might as well be blaming Nigerian fraud phone solicitors for targeting U.S. phone numbers. Just because your grandma didn’t actually win that Nigerian national lottery doesn’t mean the Nigerian government, or representative of the Nigerian government were targeting grandma.
This JAR report is nothing more than a generalized, albeit techno-worded, explanation for how Nigerians, Indians, or in this case Russians, attempt to gain your email passwords etc., nothing more. (more) . See the report in sources below.
The JAR was followed a week later by the January 7th, 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment. The ICA took the ridiculous construct of the JAR and then overlaid a political narrative that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump.
The claims within the ICA were/are completely silly, and manufactured specifically to present a political narrative intended to undermine President-elect Donald Trump. The ICA was the brain-trust of John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey. NSA Director Mike Rogers would not sign up to the “high confidence” claims, likely because he saw through the political motives of the report.
[…] “And then you hear it’s 17 agencies. Well, it’s three. And one is Brennan and one is whatever. I mean, give me a break. They’re political hacks.”
“So you look at it — I mean, you have Brennan, you have Clapper, and you have Comey. Comey is proven now to be a liar and he’s proven to be a leaker.”
“So you look at that, and you have President Putin very strongly, vehemently says he had nothing to do with that. Now, you’re not going to get into an argument. You’re going to start talking about Syria and the Ukraine.” President Donald TrumpFor a connecting article on 8kun go here,
Sources,
http://clerk.house.gov/GTImages/ST/2019/500022181.pdf
https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/george-soros-how-to-save-the-european-union-20180529
https://atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/thank-you-george/
https://atlanticcouncil.org/people/
https://www.independentsentinel.com/hot-democrat-ukraine-news-for-monday-glenns-blockbuster-video/
https://steadfastandloyal.com/politics/bombshell-crowdstrike-has-strong-ties-to-james-clapper/
https://www.scribd.com/document/335307016/FBI-Russian-Hacking-Report
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/10/29/blowing-the-whistle-on-the-witnesses-against-trump/