http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/05/inverted-yield-curve-predicting-coming-recession-commentary.html
This market indicator has predicted the past 7 recessions. Here's where it may be headed next
An inverted yield curve, which has correctly predicted the last seven recessions going back to the late 1960's, occurs when short-term interest rates yield more than longer-term rates.
The last two times the yield curve inverted was in the years 2000 and 2006 before each of the last recessions.
Here's why I predict the yield curve will invert again by the end of 2017.
Michael Pento
Mon, 5 Jun '17 | 10:49 AM ET
CNBC.com
Yellow "Caution" tape is displayed outside of the New York Stock Exchange.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Yellow "Caution" tape is displayed outside of the New York Stock Exchange.
The bounce in Treasury yields witnessed after the election of Donald Trump is now decaying in the D.C. swamp. If the Federal Reserve continues to ignore this slow growth and deflationary signal from the bond market and continues along its current rate hiking path, the yield curve will invert by the end of this year and an equity market plunge and a recession is sure to follow.
An inverted yield curve, which has correctly predicted the last seven recessions going back to the late 1960's, occurs when short-term interest rates yield more than longer-term rates. Why is an inverted yield curve so crucial in determining the direction of markets and the economy? Because when bank assets (longer-duration loans) generate less income than bank liabilities (short-term deposits), the incentive to make new loans dries up along with the money supply. And when asset bubbles are starved of that monetary fuel they burst. The severity of the recession depends on the intensity of the asset bubbles in existence prior to the inversion.
The Fed has traditionally controlled overnight lending rates between banks. That all changed when the Fed started to buy longer-term Treasurys and mortgage backed securities as a result of the Great Recession. Nevertheless, outside of these quantitative easing programs, the long end of the yield curve is primarily influenced by the inflationary expectations of investors. The yield curve inverts when central banks believe inflation is headed higher; but bond investors are convinced of the opposite.
The last two times the yield curve inverted was in the years 2000 and 2006. The inversion and subsequent recession that began in the year 2000 caused NASDAQ stocks to plummet 80 percent. The following inversion caused the Great Recession in which the S&P 500 dropped 50 percent and, according to the Case/Shiller 20-City Composite Index, home prices fell over 30 percent.
This next inversion will occur in the context of record high equity, real estate and bond market valuations that will require another government bailout. However, this time around the recession will commence with the balance sheets of the Fed and Treasury extremely overleveraged right from the start.
As you can see from the chart below, if the 10-year note yield (orange line) continues to fall along its current trajectory; and the Fed plods along with its avowed plan to hike the federal-funds rate (blue line), the yield curve should invert around the end of 2017. Market chaos and another brutal recession should soon follow.
What could prevent this baneful scenario from happening?
One of the most popular Wall Street myths is that long-term interest rates rise simply because the Fed is raising the federal-funds rate. This normally occurs because the central bank is trying to catch up to rising inflation and is initially behind the curve. However, later on in the tightening cycle long rates begin to decline as inflation is stamped out of the economy.
For example, from June 2004 thru June 2006 the Fed raised the fed-funds rate from 1 percent-5.25 percent; but the 10-year note only increased from 4.7 percent-5.2 percent. That means the benchmark note went up just 50 basis points even though the fed-funds rate was raised by 425 basis points. What is especially notable here is that GDP growth was well above 3 percent in both 2005 and 2006; as opposed to today's environment of 1.6 percent GDP growth for all of 2016, and just 1.2 percent in the first quarter of 2017. The fear of recession and deflation is the primary reason why the 10-year note yield is currently falling.
The Fed has been tightening monetary policy since it started to taper its $80 billion per month quantitative easing program back in December 2013. It has subsequently raised rates three times and is now most likely already ahead of the curve due to the anemic state of the economy. But, as always, the Fed fails to read the correct economic indicators and is now fixated on the low unemployment rate and its dubious effect on inflation.
Some argue that the yield curve won't invert if economic growth stalls because the Fed will then truncate its rate hike path. And indeed there is a lot of evidence for the second quarter recovery narrative to be proven false. For instance, April data on existing home contract closings declined 2.3 percent month over month, to a 5.57 million annual rate versus a forecast of 5.65 million. And new homes weren't much better as single family home sales declined 11.4 percent to 569,000 annualized vs. the 610,000 forecast. Pending home sales also disappointed falling 1.3 percent. Then we had durable goods falling 0.7 percent, and core capital goods orders showed no growth at all.
These data points highlight the reality that the second quarter will not spring higher from the anemic first quarter growth rate. But the problem is that the fed-funds rate is already close to 1 percent. Therefore, even if we get just two more hikes before the Fed realizes growth is faltering, that rate will be near 1.5 percent. If the economy slows enough that even the Fed takes notice, the 10-year note yield should retreat back to where it was in July of 2015 (1.35 percent). In this second scenario, the yield curve inverts despite the Fed's failure to consummate its dot plot plan.
Of course, there is a small chance that the yield curve doesn't invert due to an aggressive reverse QE program — a very quick unwinding of the Fed's $4.5 trillion balance sheet. While this may avoid an inversion of the yield curve, it would also siphon off capital from the private sector, as investors divert yet more money to the Treasury.
An aggressive selling of the Fed's balance sheet is a very unlikely scenario given the minutes of the May Federal Open Market Committee meeting. In that meeting the Fed decided to merely taper the re-investment of its balance sheet, which is the pace in that it stops reinvesting its assets. With a total debt to GDP ratio of 350 percent, this third scenario has very low odds of occurring; but should remand the economy into a recession even if such a plan is deployed.
Therefore, the only rational way to avoid an inverted yield curve, market chaos and a recession is if long-term Treasury yields reverse their long-term trend lower due to a rapid increase in GDP growth. This would only occur if Trump's agenda of repatriation of foreign earnings, tax cuts and infrastructure spending is imminently adopted. But the probability of this happening very soon is getting lower by the day.
An inverted yield curve will lead to market disorder as it did in 2000 and 2006. But this next recession starts with our national debt over $20 trillion dollars and the Fed's balance sheet at $4.5 trillion. Therefore, when the yield curve inverts for the third time this century, you can expect unprecedented chaos in markets and the economy to follow shortly after. This is because the yield curve will not only invert at a much lower starting point than at any other time in history but also with the Fed and Treasury's balance sheets already severely impaired.
There will be unprecedented volatility between inflation and deflation cycles in the future due to these factors. This represents a huge opportunity for those that can identify these inflection points and know where to invest. To be more specific, sell your long positions and get short once the curve inverts; and then be prepared to hedge against inflation when the Fed responds with helicopter money.
Commentary by Michael Pento, the president and founder of Pento Portfolio Strategies. He is also author of the book, "The Coming Bond Market Collapse," and produces the weekly podcast, "The Mid-week Reality Check."
Follow CNBC's Opinion section on Twitter @CNBCopinion.
Michael Pento
President of Pento Portfolio Strategies
by TaboolaMORE FROM CNBC
3 major events could surprise the stock market this week, Art Cashin warns
With the market near record highs, here's how two pros are investing
Cramer pinpoints three market-movers that should set off warning bells
Here are 3 things that could bother a bull market that seems to shrug off everyth…
Goldman Sachs: The market is overvalued but tech stocks should sta…
Don’t put your money in a house, says a new report
by Taboola Sponsored Links FROM THE WEB
Forget Your 401k If You Own A Home (Do This Instead)
One Smart Penny by The Easy Loan Site
Thinking Of Buying A New Couch? Go To This Site First
Wayfair
Most Americans Don't Know This Trick to Save on Their Cable and Internet Bills.
Hottest Cable Deals - Sponsored Ads
The Most Amazing Luxury Cars for 2017 Are Finally Here
Search Luxury Auto Sponsored Ads