I ask for a comparison. And more information for blogging on Steemit

I ask the curators to look at my next high-quality publications, of a professional level, which have gained cents (hereinafter I will attach the publications of other authors who simply photograph flowers on the windowsill and collect $ 30-60 daily). Please compare the quality and give me more information: How can I still make my content better in order to get the same earnings?)

1: Разные типы досок для серфинга: интервью с Мари Шоше 🏄‍♀️>>>

993 words, 100% uniqueness, $0.02
Доски для серфинга.jpg

2: Судьба: Сага клуба Винкс (сериал Netflix, 2021 г.): рецензия 👍 >>>

926 words, 100% uniqueness, $0.24

Судьба.jpg

Now about not my Posts

1: STEEM PLANTS CONTEST: planta de sábila o áloe vera por @edgargonzalez >>>
(In Spanish, in the Russian / Ukrainian community!
Why and who will read Spanish in the Russian community?)

Only 3 photos of a pot with aloe! 252 words, $31.56 (!)

Алое.jpg

I can add dozens of similar examples across the BRU community, but in order not to waste time, you can just go and see for yourself.

My questions

  • 1: Does Steemit need quality content?
  • 2: Does Steemit need readers? (who can only be attracted by quality content);
  • 3: How can I still make my content better so that I regularly earn as much as miners who simply post photos of a pot from a windowsill? (before giving me recommendations, please follow the links that I have provided here and see the quality of my content).
  • 4: If one of the curators has previously received a delegated SP, are you sure that these people will dispose of it properly? Or did the abuse start when people cast 90% of the upvotes for themselves and their circle & ignoring most of the other content?

UPD:
P.s. After this post,

Thank you for support =) Thank you very much.

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
13 Comments