I may not agree fully with all the assertions in these posts, however, I have been wrong before. As long as multiple players are spinning different stories on different Information War fronts, you should understand that the data you are basing your analysis on may be incorrect or a plant.

Having access to different views allows you to continuously cross-reference your intel and judgement.

Information War

@shayne Social Media vs Corporate Media: The Dethroning Of A Monster

@shayne's post is suported nicely by this John Robb piece, Political Networking (how social networking is changing politics forever)

@amateursociety The Amateur Society: Censorship Is Now Here – It Will Backfire

I'm cutting this close to live time for @amateursociety's open call

@richq11, series on Tavistock Institute
@richq11/the-barometer-effect-tavistock-institute-and-the-beatles
@richq11/barometer-effect-ii-tavistock-and-the-beatles
@richq11/tavistock-iii-a-brief-history-and-overview
@richq11/tavistock-institute-vi-the-tentacles
@richq11/tavistock-v-the-new-age-conspiracy

Fake News and Critical Thinking

@bkkshadow Be a Savvy Media Consumer: 8 Tips for Identifying Media Bias

I like to point out the first step in critical thinking is understanding your own bias. However, everyone else has a bias too. @bkkshadow points out specific things to look for in media to suss out bias

How you take part and IF you take part in The Information War is to to you.

All free men fight
All fighting men are free